An attempt at data verification in the EACTS Congenital Database.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE The multi-national and multi-institutional collection of data on outcomes in Congenital Heart Surgery (CHS) provides the possibility of analysis of results of treatment and may result in further improvement of the quality of care. The verification of data as far as the completeness and accuracy is necessary to give confidence to all sides--the patients, centers and regulatory authorities. The source data verification (SDV), although difficult, appears possible even in such a large-scale database. METHODS Out of 5.274 patients and 5.612 procedures data of 2003, collected in the database, 1.703 (32.3%) and 1.895 (33.8%), respectively, have been verified at five sites on following fields: IPPV time, date of birth, date of admission, date of surgery, date of discharge/mortality, body weight, case category, CPB time, AoX time, Circulatory arrest time. SDV was performed at five sites by two database officers using the sources of information different to the local copy of the database (patients' files, operation notes, perfusion charts, OR Books). Verification was performed between June 1st and July 31st 2004. Statistical analysis was performed using R-project software, ver. 2.0.0. and Welch's t-test for comparison of continuous variables. P-value >0.05 was used as statistically significant difference between groups. RESULTS Pre- and post-verification mortalities in all groups showed no significant differences although seven deaths out of 68 (10.27%) were missed. None of the other verified fields showed significant differences after verification. CONCLUSIONS Source Data Verification showed no statistically significant differences between verified and non-verified data on 30 days mortality, LOS, age, body weight, CPB time, AoX and Circulatory arrest time. IPPV time was not available in 58.6% procedures.
منابع مشابه
Initial application in the EACTS and STS Congenital Heart Surgery Databases of an empirically derived methodology of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results.
OBJECTIVES Outcomes evaluation is enhanced by assignment of operative procedures to appropriate categories based upon relative average risk. Formal risk modelling is challenging when a large number of operation types exist, including relatively rare procedures. Complexity stratification provides an alternative methodology. We report the initial application in the Congenital Heart Surgery Databa...
متن کاملA Trust Based Probabilistic Method for Efficient Correctness Verification in Database Outsourcing
Correctness verification of query results is a significant challenge in database outsourcing. Most of the proposed approaches impose high overhead, which makes them impractical in real scenarios. Probabilistic approaches are proposed in order to reduce the computation overhead pertaining to the verification process. In this paper, we use the notion of trust as the basis of our probabilistic app...
متن کاملAn empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery.
OBJECTIVE Analysis of congenital heart surgery results requires a reliable method of estimating the risk of adverse outcomes. Two major systems in current use are based on projections of risk or complexity that were predominantly subjectively derived. Our goal was to create an objective, empirically based index that can be used to identify the statistically estimated risk of in-hospital mortali...
متن کاملInitial application in the STS congenital database of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results.
BACKGROUND The analysis of the second harvest (1998-2001) of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database included the first attempt by the STS to apply a complexity-adjustment method to evaluate congenital heart surgery results. METHODS This data harvest represents the first STS multiinstitutional experience with software utilizing the international nomenclature and dat...
متن کاملQuality evaluation in congenital heart surgery.
Evaluation of quality of care is a duty of the modern medical practice. A reliable method of quality evaluation able to compare fairly institutions and inform a patient and his family of the potential risk of a procedure is clearly needed. Two articles published in this journal present their conclusions based on a similar method. As stated by D. Boethig et al. in their discussion: “Risk adjustm...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
دوره 28 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005